Background for TR_CD_to_HTML page 364 612x792

MAINE MALEFACTORS

March 9, 1898.) Mem. Ed. XXIII, 101; Bishop I, 86.

of which it is a part; and Captain Mahan has written the

best of all naval biographies, about the greatest of all

sea-captains, the man who was himself the embodiment

of sea power in action. (Bookman, June 1897.) Mem.

Ed. XIV, 327-328; Nat. Ed. XII, 281.

MAINE—SINKING OF THE. Being a Jingo, as I am

writing confidentially, I will say, to relieve my feelings,

that I would give anything if President McKinley would

order the fleet to Havana to-morrow. This Cuban

business ought to stop. The Maine was sunk by an act

of dirty treachery on the part of the Spaniards, I believe;

though we shall never find out definitely, and officially

it will go down as an accident. (Letter of February 16,

1898.) Mem. Ed. XXIII, 99; Bishop I, 85.

____________. Let me again earnestly urge that you

advise the President against our conducting any

examination in conjunction with the Spaniards as to the

Maine's disaster. I myself doubt whether it will be

possible to tell definitely how the disaster occurred by

an investigation, and it may be that we could do it as

well in conjunction with the Spaniards as alone. But I

am sure we could never convince the people at large of

this fact. . . . I was informed that both Speaker Reed and

Senator Hale had stated that we should cease building

any more battleships, in view of the disaster to the

Maine. I cannot believe that the statement is true, for of

course such an attitude, if supported by the people,

would mean that we had reached the last pitch of

national cowardice and baseness. I earnestly wish that

you could see your way clear now, without waiting a

day, to send in a special message, stating that in view of

the disaster to the Maine (and perhaps in view of the

possible needs of this country) instead of

recommending one battleship you ask for two, or better

still, that four battleships be authorized immediately by

Congress. (To Secretary John D. Long, February 19,

1898.) Mem. Ed. XXIII, 99; Bishop I, 85.

____________. Of course I have nothing to say as to

the policy of the Government, but I hope this incident

[Maine] will not be treated by itself, but as part of the

whole Cuban business. There is absolutely but one

possible solution of a permanent nature to that affair,

and that is Cuban independence. The sooner we make

up our minds to this the better. If we can attain our

object peacefully, of course we should try to do so; but

we should attain it one way or the other anyhow. (To

Henry White,

MAINE. See also CUBA; SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR.

MAJORITY—TYRANNY OF THE. The majority in

a democracy has no more right to tyrannize over a

minority than, under a different system, the latter would

have to oppress the former; and . . . if there is a moral

principle at stake, the saying that the voice of the

people is the voice of God may be quite as untrue, and

do quite as much mischief, as the old theory of the

divine right of kings. (1887.) Mem. Ed. VIII, 91; Nat.

Ed. VII, 80.

MAJORITY. See also MINORITY; POPULAR RULE;

PRIVILEGE.

"MALEFACTORS OF GREAT WEALTH." Too

much cannot be said against the men of wealth who

sacrifice everything to getting wealth. There is not in

the world a more ignoble character than the mere

money-getting American, insensible to every duty,

regardless of every principle, bent only on amassing a

fortune, and putting his fortune only to the basest

uses —whether these uses be to speculate in stocks and

wreck railroads himself, or to allow his son to lead a

life of foolish and expensive idleness and gross

debauchery, or to purchase some scoundrel of high

social position, foreign or native, for his daughter. Such

a man is only the more dangerous if he occasionally

does some deed like founding a college or endowing a

church, which makes those good people who are also

foolish forget his real iniquity. These men are equally

careless of the working men, whom they oppress, and

of the State, whose existence they imperil. There are

not very many of them, but there is a very great number

of men who approach more or less closely to the type,

and, just in so far as they do so approach, they are

curses to the country. (Forum, February 1895.) Mem.

Ed. XV, 10; Nat. Ed. XIII, 9.

"MALEFACTORS OF GREAT WEALTH" AND

THE PANIC OF 1907. It may well be that the

determination of the government (in which, gentlemen,

it will not waver) to punish certain malefactors of great

wealth, has been responsible for something of the

trouble; at least to the extent of having caused these

men to combine to bring about as much financial stress

as possible, in order to discredit the policy of the

government and thereby secure a reversal of that policy,

so that they may enjoy

[327]