Background for TR_CD_to_HTML page 644 612x792

TENNESSEE TOLERANCE

now as at any previous time in our history. It is

eminently fitting that once a year our people should set

apart a day for praise and thanksgiving to the Giver of

Good, and, at the same time that they express their

thankfulness for the abundant mercies received, should

manfully acknowledge their shortcomings and pledge

themselves solemnly and in good faith to strive to

overcome them. During the past year we have been

blessed with bountiful crops. Our business prosperity

has been great. No other people has ever stood on as

high a level of material well-being as ours now stands.

We are not threatened by foes from without. The foes

from whom we should pray to be delivered are our own

passions, appetites, and follies; and against these there

is always need that we should war. (Proclamation,

November 2, 1905.) Presidential Addresses and State

Papers VI, 1477-1478.

THAYER, ABBOTT H., and GERALD H. See

effect that I did not deem it my duty to interfere, that is,

to forbid the action which more than anything else in

actual fact saved the situation. The result justified my

judgment. The panic was stopped, public confidence in

the solvency of the threatened institution being at once

restored. (1913.) Mem. Ed. XXII, 502; Nat. Ed. XX,

432.

TENNESSEE COAL AND IRON COMPANY. See

also PANIC OF 1907.

TENURE OF OFFICE. See OFFICE.

TEXANS. See COWBOYS.

TEXAS—CONQUEST OF. The conquest of Texas

should properly be classed with conquests like those of

the Norse sea-rovers. The virtues and faults alike of the

Texans were those of a barbaric age. They were

restless, brave, and eager for adventure, excitement, and

plunder; they were warlike, resolute, and enterprising;

they had all the marks of a young and hardy race,

flushed with the pride of strength and self-confidence.

On the other hand they showed again and again the

barbaric vices of boastfulness, ignorance, and cruelty;

and they were utterly careless of the rights of others,

looking upon the possessions of all weaker races as

simply their natural prey. A band of settlers entering

Texas was troubled by no greater scruples of

conscience than, a thousand years before, a shipload of

Knut's followers might have felt at landing in England;

and when they were engaged in warfare with the

Mexicans they could count with certainty upon

assistance from their kinsfolk who had been left behind,

and for the same reasons that had enabled Rolf’s

Norsemen on the seacoast of France to rely confidently

on Scandinavian help in their quarrels with their

Karling overlords. (1887.) Mem. Ed. VIII, 132-133;

Nat. Ed. VII, 115.

THANKSGIVING DAY. When nearly three centuries

ago the first settlers came to the country which has now

become this great Republic, they fronted not only

hardships and privation, but terrible risk to their lives.

In those grim years the custom grew of setting apart one

day in each year for a special service of thanksgiving to

the Almighty for preserving the people through the

changing seasons. The custom has now become

national and hallowed by immemorial usage. We live in

easier and more plentiful times than our forefathers, the

men who with rugged strength faced the rugged days;

and yet the dangers to national life are quite as great

ANIMALS—PROTECTIVE COLORATION OF.

THEATRE. See ABBEY THEATRE.

THEOLOGY. See REASON; RELIGION.

THEORISTS. See CROMWELL, O.; Federalist, The;

PRACTICALITY.

THIRD TERM ISSUE. See PRESIDENCY.

THRIFT. Thrift and industry are indispensable virtues;

but they are not all-sufficient. We must base our

appeals for civic and national betterment on nobler

grounds than those of mere business expediency.

(Forum, February 1895.) Mem. Ed. XV, 13; Nat. Ed.

XIII, II.

THRIFT. See also WEALTH.

THRIFT STAMPS. See LIBERTY LOANS.

TOBACCO TRUST. See NORTHERN SECURITIES

CASE; SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST ACT .

TOLERANCE. In a republic, to be successful we must

learn to combine intensity of conviction with a broad

tolerance of difference of conviction. Wide differences

of opinion in matters of religious, political and social

belief must exist if conscience and intellect alike are not

to be stunted, if there is to be room for healthy growth.

Bitter internecine hatreds, based on such differences,

are signs, not of earnestness of belief, but of that

fanaticism which, whether religious or antireligious,

demo-

[607]